Satchel, Bucky and John

Friday, February 23, 2007

Another quote, this time from Diplock LJ in Morris v Martin:

I agree that this appeal should be allowed although the legal route which has led me to this conclusion is not at all points identical with that traversed by the Master of the Rolls. After all. that is the beauty of the common law; it is a maze and not a motorway.

I'm going crazy reading privity cases..

More Fuzzy Logic @ 7:51 PM

Joel
DHS
Hwa Chong
NUS Law
mail me at huricane7@gmail.com

Leave a note...

profile rants links tags

@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/33839580?origin\x3dhttp://novusactusinterveniens.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } });